When I was
in Dublin, Ireland recently, I had the good fortune to see a small
retrospective exhibition of the works of Margret Clarke at the
National Gallery of Ireland.
Margret Clarke (1884-1961) was a woman
artist who achieved sth century. I mention the fact that she was a woman
because in those days there was a great deal of prejudice against
women and thus for a woman to have achieved success in those days is
impressive.
Ms. Clarke began her artistic training
at Newry Municipal Technical College continuing on to the Dublin
Metropolitan School of Art (“DMSA”). Her goal was to become an
art teacher and she obtained an art teacher certificate in 1907.
However, she won numerous scholarships and prizes thus enabling her
to embark on a career as a professional artist.
Two paintings in the exhibition by her
teacher at the DMSA, Sir William Orpen, show Ms. Clarke as having an
intelligent face with lively eyes. These same characteristics appear
in her self-portrait.
Ms. Clarke achieved success as a
portrait painter and her subjects include such ntables as the future
Irish prime minister Eamon de Valera. The portrait commissions are
traditional and somewhat reminiscent of John Singer Sargent's
portrait commissions.
Her private works, which cover diverse
subjects including family portraits, nude studies and genre
paintings, are less conservative. You can see influences of artists
such as Cezane and El Greco as well as Asian prints.
Still, the works that really spoke to
me were Ms. Clarke's drawings, mostly graphite on paper but also
charcoal on paper. These drawings were technically superb but at the
same time sensitive. Her drawing of her husband, the artist and
designer Harry Clarke, done around the time of their marriage in 1914
conveys the emotion that she felt for the sitter bringing him alive.
Similarly, her sketches of Julia O'Brien, who worked in the Clarke
household in the 1920s have unusual sensitivity. They communicate,
which to me is the hallmark of good art.
Margret Clarke was only the second
woman to become a full time member of the Royal Hiberian Academy in
1927. But while she achieved this degree of success during her
lifetime, her reputation faded subsequently. This refelects the fact
that the art establishment became co-oped by abstraction during the
mid to late 20th century. Figurative work was rejected as
passe and unintellectual. Such thinking has now been exposed as
close-minded nonsense. Therefore, the National Gallery of Ireland's
decision to spotlight the work of an artist who has undeservedly been
ignored is to be applauded.
Comments
Post a Comment